Home | Riverside Matters | Surrey Gravel
The government requires Surrey County Council to plan for a specified amount of minerals to be quarried in Surrey each year.
There was a public consultation on the plans in November & December 2009
See plans for mineral extraction in Surrey (Nov-Dec 2009 consultation)
the documents that Surrey CC propose to submit to the
government for independent examination, and on
the
Proposals Map
which accompanies them.
Download the background report
This describes the way in which potential areas for
future sand and gravel extraction have been identified for
inclusion in the Surrey Minerals Plan (the plan). It
describes the techniques and judgements that have been used
to assess the suitability of land for mineral extraction.
See Surrey County Council's assessment of sites for sand and gravel extraction
Assessment of Potential Minerals Zones (PMZs) for Extraction of
Sand and Gravel in Surrey. This report was prepared as
background information to assist in the preparation of the
Minerals Plan. A full copy of the text of the report, maps of
the zones, and the transportation assessment are available.
Report Extract - PMZ22 & PMZ23 assessments![]()

The status of the gravel plans is now in question because of a recent reduction in the Government's Surrey mineral allocation (see panel below)

PMZ22 - Desborough Island
Local people and community groups are deeply disturbed at the possibility of losing local green open spaces to gravel extraction. Weybridge Liberal Democrats are committed to protecting green open spaces in Weybridge. In an area of increasing urbanisation our green spaces are of critical landscape and amenity value, so any proposal to extract gravel would be unacceptable.
The land at Broadwater Farm and Desborough Island is not
only of very high amenity and landscape value but is strategic
floodplain. The aquifers in the underlying gravel allow a
considerable flow of water (visible by the water rising in the
fields when the river is running particularly high) which is
essential to moderating flood risk. This would be lost if
gravel extraction was followed by inert backfill. Surrey
recognises some of these issues: see report Extract - PMZ22 & PMZ23
assessments
PMZ21 - Hamm Court Farm
- Surrey CC preferred site for gravel & sand extractionElmbridge Borough Council has made recommendations about the
(PMZ21)
"preferred site" plans. This followed Cllr
Miles Macleod raising concerns about a number of aspects
relevant to EBC and Elmbridge Residents. Hamm Court is directly
adjacent to Weybridge and the Wey Navigation, and access would
be via the A317.
Gravel extraction would not only have a big impact on residents of Hamm Court, but would affect traffic and have an impact on Weybridge residents, and also cause potential disturbance visitors to the national Trust Wey Navigation. There would be a danger of pollution of the waterways from the extraction works and processing plant, and a risk of noise pollution. In local discussions with Surrey, SCC had stated that the area of wet woodland adjacent to the Wey Navigation would be excluded from the site, but this is still in the plans.
The proposal to create a new traffic light controlled junction with the A317 (on the single carriageway Weybridge approach) could cause major disruption of traffic flow. As other councillors noted, it only takes a brief blockage in traffic there to cause gridlock back into Weybridge town centre.
The formal Elmbridge Borough Council response incorporated points relating to these concerns, stating that Elmbridge Borough Council:
(f) recommends that the portion of the Hamm Court Farm Site in the South East corner, which contains wet woodland, be removed from the designation and that no operational activity take place in this area; and
(g) recommends that policy MC15 Transport of Minerals should be applied to the Hamm Court Farm Site to ensure that the potential adverse impacts on traffic and congestion in Weybridge is prevented.
Download the Elmbridge BC submission![]()
We are hopeful that this preferred zone will not be exploited. We
would like to see it removed from the preferred list. Note
that Surrey officers, in
(PMZ21)
,
conclude that because of amenity impact and transport issues, they are
"of the opinion that the zone should not be considered for inclusion
in the MDF" [Minerals Development Framework]
The amount of minerals required by the government to be quarried in Surrey has been reduced by 50,000 tonnes a year.
Surrey County Council had been fighting for the cut, arguing there were not enough locations where minerals could be extracted without causing harm.
It also warned that supplies would be nearly exhausted before 2026, the target year set by the government.
A panel of planning inspectors approved a reduction in the proposed allocation from 1.32 million tonnes.
'Unacceptable harm'
Dr Lynne Hack, cabinet member for environment, said: "I am delighted that we have achieved a reduction in the amount of sand and gravel we are required to produce.
"Surrey has done its bit in the past as one of the chief producers in the south east, but there are few sites remaining which can be quarried without causing unacceptable harm to residents and the environment.
"Our resources are already being steadily depleted and it would be detrimental to local builders and companies, and to the county as a whole, if supplies were completely exhausted within the next 18 years."
The panel's recommendation now goes to the government for a final decision.
See the full story at BBC NEWS (Published: 19 December
2009)